Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

About You Your healthy mind, body, and spirit play a vital role in all the important relationships of your life. Share your advice and insights here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
nightling's Avatar

nightling is drinking coffee, reading science articles, and enjoying the sunshine.

Veteran

Join Date: Sep 2009

Posts: 1,270

See profile

Supporting your child is simply a matter of loving him or her.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:35 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#191   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 10,914

See profile

peg099 wrote :
So it's all or nothing? Either the household income remains the same or it is completely absent?

I know that this is probably beyond your comprehension, but even though kids do need basic material needs provided for them, they have non-material needs as well. It's not only an issue of income - it's an issue of balancing all their needs with economic realities.

Thanks, now that I have made 20 posts (all getting one star) stating this.

Economic reality means I cannot afford to provide for more than one house. Economic reality means affordibility of children rests upon two incomes in the household. Economic reality means persons who dump their partner do not deserve their partner's money!

I get that children need other things, like demonstration of the importance of work ethic. I figure I am good with that.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:41 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#192   Reply With Quote
Gumbee's Avatar

Gumbee is apparently a

Quick Study

Join Date: Sep 2009

Posts: 59

See profile

Deleted by choice

Last edited by Gumbee; November 6th, 2009 at 08:20 am. Reason: Slept on it. Decided against it
- November 5th, 2009, 08:48 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#193   Reply With Quote
cardguy's Avatar

Pacesetter

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 297

See profile

I might point out again that your original position was that child support was always terrible, that apparently it always involves women who leave their husbands and collect checks for a living after that.

Just to clarify: is your statement about all child support or just those cases where the woman is trying to squeeze a life out of her husband's work? Also, do you agree that child support payments vary greatly and usually do not result in the non-custodial parent contributing 50% of the cost of raising their child?
- November 5th, 2009, 08:52 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#194   Reply With Quote
marguitar's Avatar

marguitar says... aaahhhh, acceptance brings such relief

Newbie

Join Date: Sep 2009

Posts: 38

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Sure glad I make the right decision before hand. It's best not to take these risks at all.
"The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and LIVE!
-Leo Buscaglia
- November 5th, 2009, 09:00 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#195   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 10,914

See profile

I state that my values are that payments never be made to ex-partners, for any "reason."

That costs of children rest with the person having possession, and that the person without possession has no economic obligation.

That the detail provided in many posts is far beyond what my salary can provide, and that expenses in excess of what I can provide are not appropriate, regardless of what was available prior to marital dissolution or that the ex-partner wants.

Further, I state that a person should never have a government-mandated expense which causes extraordinary hardship, such as losing one's home or being deprived of his income.
- November 5th, 2009, 09:03 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#196   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 wishes she could sleep

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 10,937

See profile

marguitar wrote :
"The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and LIVE!
-Leo Buscaglia
Great quote!
- November 5th, 2009, 09:06 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#197   Reply With Quote
clearlyoblique's Avatar

clearlyoblique wears the skirt in the relationship

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jan 2009

Posts: 2,515

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Thanks, now that I have made 20 posts (all getting one star) stating this.

Economic reality means I cannot afford to provide for more than one house. Economic reality means affordibility of children rests upon two incomes in the household. Economic reality means persons who dump their partner do not deserve their partner's money!

I get that children need other things, like demonstration of the importance of work ethic. I figure I am good with that.
OMG! I missed a few.

*CO scampers off to one-star other Pon Farr inspired posting lunacy.*

Last edited by clearlyoblique; November 5th, 2009 at 09:57 pm. Reason: Incidentally, not all your posts were rated. But I hate to see you exaggerate, so I fixed it for ya!
- November 5th, 2009, 09:20 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#198   Reply With Quote
TinkerKat's Avatar

TinkerKat

Virtuoso

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 3,485

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I state that my values are that payments never be made to ex-partners, for any "reason."

That costs of children rest with the person having possession, and that theperson without possession has no economic obligation.

That the detail provided in many posts is far beyond what my salary can provide, and that expenses in excess of what I can provide are not appropriate, regardless of what was available prior to marital dissolution or that the ex-partner wants.

Further, I state that a person should never have a government-mandated expense which causes extraordinary hardship, such as losing one's home or being deprived of his income.
Ok, in my case, my ex was the sole source of income and he volunteered 80% of his income because he did not want possession of the children. So he wasn't being deprived by a goverment mandate, he knew upfront what he would have to live off of and he choose to sign the divorce papers. And he choose to give up any and all physical possession of our children. And even though he's entitled to full visitation, he refuses to fulfill that obligation of the divorce degree.
- November 5th, 2009, 09:20 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#199   Reply With Quote
Wonderwoman402's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2009

Posts: 714

See profile

sabete2002 wrote :
Again, "thousands" of $$$? For Tae Kwan Do??? Where are you getting these numbers from?
What I paid for TaeKwonDo lessons for my daughter, in the midwest:

$94/month + $80 extra every other month for testing + one-time expense for gear, patches on uniform, etc. It took about 3 years to earn her black belt. Totals right around $5,000. More if you want to include the mileage cost of getting her to the lessons.

Pride in my daughter, and her self-confidence in accomplishing that goal = priceless.
- November 5th, 2009, 09:21 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#200   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shall I call, email, or not? funnyengineergal Dating 65 October 6th, 2009 09:56 pm
To Call or Not to Call islandrain80 Dating 9 September 15th, 2009 03:38 pm
Secure call is worthless to buy passat1 Using eHarmony 0 August 16th, 2009 11:44 am

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“Kudos princess1085! Not only is that an excellent list but also very similar to my own. There's no need to repeat your list, though. Mine is just in a different order. I look at statements made ... ” – Cimaronna

Join the “Online Dating 101: Photos” discussion

“That's the best attitude to have! By the time I was 26, I had the perfect job. Was I successful? Sure people knew my name and requested me by the time I was 27. I was on top of the world and ... ” – roguewolf1

Join the “When do you consider yourself successful?” discussion

“I'm A-. Ambition like the type A people, and can relax and have fun like type B.” – Mr_Right

Join the “Are you type "A" or "B"? Which works best for you?” discussion

“ Small but important point: the man and "friend" involved had 1,933 text messages in one month, not a year. You were responding to a post that said that many even in one year was excessive. You ... ” – DreamingOfAtlantis

Join the “Obsessed and angry” discussion

“The problem with texting is some people are using that solely as a way to communicate. I feel it's fine if you are thinking about someone and you want to let them know or you are at work and want to ... ” – Trishyh

Join the “Has Texting Become the Scourge of the Dating World?” discussion

“If you look back to Steve Harvey's book, one of the things that us guys do when we're interested in a girl is "profess". We tell people that this person is x, where x is the label (fiance, ... ” – Mr_Right

Join the “Relationship "labels" - how important are they to you?” discussion

“Is there something wrong with gold diggers? With prices what they are, I've been working a couple claims in the Bradshaw's. Lots of work, lots of digging, lots of fun, almost always beer and gas ... ” – Faira

Join the “Does a woman's financial well being, profession, and wage matter to the men?” discussion

“I think youshould always take pride in how you look and spend the extra few minutes to make sure that you are put together--even if you are just running errands on a Sat morning, put on some eyeliner ... ” – Annnnne

Join the “Dolling up constantly” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0