Matchmaking Around the World

They've been around since the beginning of time and have paired billions of couples: matchmakers. Learn how these esteemed fortune tellers determined what made a "perfect match."

picture of a bride and groom
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Remember Yente, the matchmaker in Fiddler on the Roof? She was in charge of pairing prospective brides and grooms in her community based on their family finances and backgrounds. In one of the famous scenes from that musical, several young girls sing:

Matchmaker, Matchmaker,
Make me a match,
Find me a find,
Catch me a catch.
Matchmaker, Matchmaker,
Look through your book,
And make me a perfect match!

And even though Yente was rarely able to provide “a perfect match,” no one doubted the fact that she played a crucial role in her community, making sure that the correct young women ended up with the correct young men.

These days, most of us go about looking for the “perfect match” a bit differently. Matchmaking is still a thriving business all around the world, but it’s changed quite a bit.

Historical Matchmakers

Whether we’re talking about a village matron, an Ashkenazi Jewish shadchan, a Hindu astrologer, or some sort of shaman shuffling tarot cards, matchmakers have long been seen as essential advisors when it comes to creating this most important of unions. And of course, when family history and finances—not to mention the stars—dictate that two people are right for each other, it can make it pretty tough for anyone, including the young couple, to object.

It may be hard to believe now, but the role of the matchmaker was (and in some cultures still is) taken very seriously. Not long ago in Lithuania, matchmakers were honored at the weddings of their unions, and often received more attention than the bride and groom. However, they were also held responsible for the success of the couple. 

Other, less formal types of matchmaking took place around certain social events and dances. For example, in frontier North America, the line dance and square dance were traditions that often played a big role in determining future partners (which, of course, put a fair amount of pressure on the dancers’ abilities to do-si-do). In farm communities, religious and other social gatherings served as early venues for matchmakers, who would attend such events and advise families regarding which potential marriage-age children were available and compatible with their own. Clergy would often serve this role in one way or another—think, for example, of the village priest in medieval Catholic society or the rabbi in traditional Jewish communities—since they were usually some of the most trusted authorities in those societies.

In traditional Russian societies, matchmakers were often some of the most highly respected people in the community. Whether they performed their duties out of goodwill for the families or hired themselves out professionally, matchmakers became indispensible players in the important task of mate selection. One of their chief duties, after suggesting a possible match, was to set up a meeting called a smotrini (from the Russian word for “looking”). The potential groom and his family visited the prospective bride’s home, where it was determined whether or not the couple would become engaged.

Obviously, most of us today go about finding our potential mates quite differently. But matchmaking is still an attractive option for people in all different cultures. Let’s look at some more recent alternatives.

Traditional Matchmaking

In almost all ancient cultures there were traditional matchmakers. In fact, until the mythology of romantic love began to flourish in the Christian world during medieval times, nearly all marriages were arranged in one way or another. There was no assumption that “true love” was a universal human right, and young people didn’t have a free choice to select their mates. They were completely dependent on their parents and the professional help of matchmakers when it came to selecting their future spouses.

And while that practice is much less common these days, traditional matchmakers still abound in modern society. Think, for example, of the arranged marriages that are still very common in many cultures. Even in postmodern Western society, there are plenty of traditional matchmakers still plying their trade and matching people up, one by one. If you don’t believe it, just Google the phrase “millionaire club” and you’ll find dozens of sites offering, as one company puts it, to help “successful men meet their beautiful and intelligent wives or girlfriends.”

This, of course, is only a small step away from the type of matchmaking that links men with women from other countries. The phrase “mail-order bride” came into the common vernacular decades ago, and while today’s pictures are in color on a computer screen rather than a grainy black-and-white photo in an envelope, the updated version of this antiquated practice is still alive and well.

So if you’re looking for a bit of help as you search for the right someone who can offer everything you want in a relationship, choose your help wisely. There’s an old Russian proverb: “Choose a matchmaker, not a bride.” We’re not sure we endorse the wisdom in this saying wholeheartedly. But if you want some help in finding just the right person for you, then get that help from someone who can get a sense of who you really are and can introduce you to the person who is a great fit for you and who can make you as happy as possible for a lifetime.

Rate this article:
starstarstarhalfstarunstar
(Avg: 3.5 out of 5)
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

94 comments on “Matchmaking Around the World


Leave a Comment

YOU WILL BE PROMPTED TO REGISTER OR LOG IN WHEN POSTING

Watch this topic

Recent comments on this article

Read all comments

Posts: 23

See Profile

steelerbear wrote:

Thank you, eHarmony, for having this article. It's nice to find something on this site that, for once, speaks to people other than Bible-pushing conservatives. Smile

P.S. - I work at a church. Flaming from the aforementioned Bible-pushing conservatives is not necessary, and to do so would only perpetuate the use of and need for this stereotype.

Let's define the difference between good & healthy, and risky and consequential. Being a Christian, I do not insists that eHarmony promote only the biblical views on dating and relationships. But I do, however, insist that advice given be within certain physically and emotionally healthy boundaries. This article gives tips on how to engage and conduct yourself in a commitment- and relationship-free sex with another person. The author him/herself said, to be precise, "one-time roll in the hay isn�t exactly emotionally fulfilling," acknowledging the emotional consequences of such behavior. Whether you like it or not, body and soul are interconnected, and while one suffers, the other goes haywire, too. Being so intimately close, you do in fact grow emotionally attached to a person, and it hurts to let go afterwards. Once you've been so close with a person, you'll never look at him/her the same way. It's rather difficult to develop true friendship; it's hard to characterize the person by what they're like, but rather the memories of what this person's body is like will stand in the way. So, the ultimate "solution" for future fulfillment is to find someone new to have sex with next time... yet still not having a companion. It's hard, or impossible, to develop connection in reverse. That is why it's healthy to become best friends for life and then engage in sex, which by the way is God's gift. It would be far more fulfilling to be intimate with someone you love and prefer above anyone else. You will be happy and satisfy all your longings, not just the sex drive. There is a whole lot more meaning to a life of two people who truly passionately love each other, than merely uncommitted sex. I always believed that eHarmony's goal was for singles to find a companion and a friend of a lifetime, giving people real advice on dating, marriage, conflict resolution, and the like. But now I see that it's just another chip in the rubble of worthless web services, who made a lot of money on idiots like myself. And their "matches" are off by a long shot. I thought I found a flower in the desert... but I was mistaken.
- April 17, 2008 02:41 PM

just2sweet2 I DID! I DID find the ONE!!!!!

Posts: 116

See Profile

socalvic wrote:
YoungTexan - do we really need that kind of stuff in here? Please thump your bible elsewhere.

socalvic there are few things that really offend me...Your statement, to 'thump your bible elsewhere' is possibly one of the rudest, most judgemental, and stupid expressions of a ignorant person that I have ever had the supreme displeasure of ever hearing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW, I don't 'thump' my bible...but if your head were here right now, I may be tempted to...oh, sorry...got in the 'flesh'....

Thank God, this so called 'bible thumper' can have the REAL GOD take care of people who are so ignorant...Yeah, just like He took care of me, when I was an ignorant, opinionated young woman, who wouldn't even give ANYONE EVEN 3 SECONDS TO TELL ME ABOUT JESUS, AND THE BLESSING OF KNOWING JUST WHO HE IS, AND WHO I AM IN HIM!!!!!

So, watch out...I'm gonna keep praying for you.....bible thumper indeed...'whack!'

- April 17, 2008 02:17 PM

Towson, MD

Posts: 19

See Profile

Thank you, eHarmony, for having this article. It's nice to find something on this site that, for once, speaks to people other than Bible-pushing conservatives. Smile

P.S. - I work at a church. Flaming from the aforementioned Bible-pushing conservatives is not necessary, and to do so would only perpetuate the use of and need for this stereotype.

- April 17, 2008 12:05 PM

94 comments so far » read more